From rg1@sanger.ac.uk  Wed Aug 25 16:46:19 1999
Return-Path: <rg1@sanger.ac.uk>
Received: from fes5.sanger.ac.uk (root@fes5 [193.62.204.9])
	by jess.sanger.ac.uk (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA13961
	for <mar@sanger.ac.uk>; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:46:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from localhost (rg1@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fes5.sanger.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA23489
	for mar; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:46:18 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <199908251546.QAA23489@fes5.sanger.ac.uk>
X-Authentication-Warning: fes5.sanger.ac.uk: rg1@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: mar@sanger.ac.uk
Subject: end seqs
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 16:46:06 +0100
From: rg1@sanger.ac.uk
X-Mts: smtp
Status: R


------- Forwarded Message


Last batch of end sequences mis-named. 
Could you please correct and 
resend to me with the correct name by the side.


Thanks 


Rhian


The clones that we are going to re-sequence are:
1201.t7
263.t3
p7A11.sp6
140.t3
193.t3

Sorry, it's totally my fault, need to go back to re-tracking school
I think!!  - Liz


Name in 	Correct name
file already
p24G6.t7	p24E11.t7

29B4.t7		24G6.t7

29F2.t7		29B4.t7	

136.t7		29F2.t7	

193.t7		140.t7

200.t7		193.t7

454.t7		263.t7

467.t7		454.t7

p5B1.t7		correct

918.t7		467.t7	

984.t7		918.t7	

999.t7		995.t7

1028.t7		999.t7

1060.t7	        1028.t7

1080.t7		1060.t7			

1158.t7		1080.t7	

1201.t7		1158.t7

1326.t7		correct	

p5B7.t7		correct	

1399.t7		correct

1822.t7		correct

1851.t7		correct

p7A12.t7a	p7A11.t7

p7G4.t7		p7A12.t7a	

p24E11.t7	p7G4.t7	

p4F9.sp6	correct

p4F9.t7a	correct

p24G6.sp6	correct

29B4.sp6	correct

29F2.sp6	correct	

454.t3		correct				

467.t3		correct	

p5B1.sp6	correct	

918.t3		correct			

995.t3		correct					

995.t7a		correct	

999.t3		correct

1028.t3		correct

1060.t3		correct

1080.t3		correct

1158.t3		correct

1201.t3		correct

1326.t3		correct

p5B7.sp6	correct

1399.t3		correct

1822.t3		correct

1851.t3		correct	

p7A12.sp6a	correct	

p7G4.sp6	correct

p24E11.sp6	correct

------- End of Forwarded Message

